Strategies to reduce the costs of aging in place

Finance & Accounting

Sponsor content from

The number of Americans ages 65 and over is projected to nearly double by 2060. And most would prefer to age in place and hiresenior caregivers if needed.

Quality homecare is expensive, but clients can reduce costs by hiring caregivers directly rather than using an agency. However, hiring household employees directly brings with it a host of issues, such as employment tax filings and labor law compliance. Clients need help making informed decisions about the different homecare options so they can age in place on their own terms.

In this podcast, Tom Breedlove, Senior Director at Care.com HomePay, discusses:

  • The pros and cons of using a home care agency or directly hiring senior care employees
  • The tax obligations of being a first-party employer
  • Cost-saving tips including non-taxable compensation, medical tax deductions, and sleep time exemptions
  • Resources available to help clients age in place

Hear more about addressing the HR, legal, and financial issues surrounding in-home care.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Storytelling In The COVID-19 Era: The Power–And Delicate Nature–Of Corporate Communications
Small businesses can use PPP loans for masks and reopening expenses like sneeze guards in proposed bill
What’s Next For The Hospitality Industry: Experts Dish On Best Practices For Hotel And Restaurant Re-Openings
IRS Tax Forums to go virtual this year
NJ restaurant owner: Just because businesses can reopen does not mean they will survive

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *